Architectural practice
without the compromise.
At a glance
Fit alongside Archicad
Archicad is a capable mid-market BIM platform, which means documentation rides on top of the whole model and Teamwork stack. Synaps takes drafting, libraries, and weekly sheet issue off that critical path, while Archicad keeps BIM authoring and IFC.
Side by side
Feature-by-feature comparison of Synaps and Graphisoft Archicad.
| Feature | Synaps | ArchiCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Primary surface | 2D drafting + sheet index | BIM authoring + 2D documentation |
| Sheet sets | First-class, drag-reorder | Layout Book + Master Layouts |
| Linked views | Live across plan, section, detail | Native, model-coupled |
| Office libraries | Publish / edit / view roles | Library Manager + BIMcloud |
| Multi-user | Real-time editing + history | Teamwork + BIMcloud |
| IFC / OPEN BIM | Import/export, not the centre of gravity | Core strength |
| PDF issue | Tuned for issued sets | Publisher tool |
| Pricing model | Per editor, monthly | Per seat, annual + BIMcloud subscription |
Honest tradeoffs
Migration path
A two-week pilot on a live job. If documentation does not get faster, stop, even if the comparison reads in our favour.
Export one Archicad library slice and one sheet set. Set up the project in Synaps.
Run internal review in Synaps. Archicad stays the federated archive.
Issue one PDF set from Synaps. Decide which phase lives where.
Yes, import and export. IFC is not the centre of gravity in Synaps, but it round-trips with Archicad and other OPEN BIM tools.
Yes, that is the standard mixed stack. Archicad stays the BIM archive; Synaps becomes the drafting and sheet-issue front-end.
Synaps is multi-user real-time with history out of the box, without BIMcloud as a separate license. Teamwork stays a strength for full BIM coordination.
Per editor, yes, and without the BIMcloud subscription tier. Pilots usually start with two editors and a studio lead.
More comparisons